To condone the acquisition of a place of worship in such circumstances is to efface the principle of secularism from the Constitution…" Section 7 of the Acquisition Act is slanted in favour of the Hindu community as section 7 (2) required maintenance status-quo as prevailed before 7-1-93, which would mean that idols must be retained where they were before 7-1-93 and puja as carried on as before. Ayodhya Verdict In brief the court Secularism questioned: The Bench indeed has done well to record its revulsion at two incidents that represented an onslaught on the psyche of secular India: the desecration of the masjid in 1949 when Hindu idols were planted surreptitiously under its central dome, and the planned destruction of the whole structure by the foot soldiers of some fringe VERDICT BY SUPREME COURT ON AYODHYA DISPUTE : In allowing a temple to come up through a government-appointed trust at the disputed site in Ayodhya, the Supreme Court has apparently chosen a path most conducive to social harmony. From UPSC perspective, the following things are important : It had while modifying the part of the Nagaraj verdict, rejected the Centre’s argument that Nagaraj misread the creamy layer concept by applying it to SC/ST. Nagaraj Case. In Jarnail Singh vs Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2018), the court dealt with a batch of appeals on the correctness of the Supreme Court’s judgment in M Nagaraj Ayodhya verdict | Ruins don’t always indicate demolition, observes Supreme Court ‘No breach of constitutional secularism’ Eminent jurist, Upendra Baxi, however, said there was no breach The Ayodhya judgment did result in a victory for the majority and coincidentally for the mob that demolished the Babri Masjid, but a reading of the judgment clearly shows disapproval and disavowal... The Supreme Court’s Verdict on the Ayodhya dispute. Details: Eminent jurist, Upendra Baxi, however, said there was no breach of constitutional secularism involved in the Centre being given the responsibility. Baxi said the Centre was already empowered under Section 6 of the Acquisition of Certain Area at Ayodhya Act,1993 to vest the disputed land in a trust or authority. He pointed out Since the victory of the BJP in 2014 there has been much speculation about the fate of Muslims and their place in Indian politics. This paper seeks to argue that the recent rise of the BJP has caused the center of politics to move further to the right which in turn has precipitated a change in the politics of the opposition parties as well wherein Muslims have become political “untouchables.” Secularism came to be defined not only as equal rights for all, regardless of religious affiliation, but also as comprising special minority rights on the assumption that minority numbers alone would not allow them to protect their interests in a democracy. This constitutional settlement was further bolstered by the electoral realities of India 40 landmark judgments that changed the course of India From Aarushi Talwar murder to Ajmal Kasab death sentence, our judiciary has been at its finest in declaring verdicts over the years.
[index] [8645] [5026] [7945] [4433] [7703] [620] [7430] [7678] [2184] [3954]
Copyright © 2024 hot.playbestrealmoneygames.xyz